Know the verdict before you write.

1. 01Is the core application civil-only?

   Yes — civil programmes only, stated in our docsThere is dual-use adjacency we have not resolved yetDefence or weapons-adjacent is part of the plan
2. 02What stage are you raising?

   Pre-seed, Seed, Series A or BSeries C or later / growth
3. 03Which ring does the technology touch?

   Reactor systems & civil nuclearMaterials for extreme environmentsFuel cycle, safety & monitoring (non-weapons)Pilot scale, qualification & manufacturingPower generation, grid & efficiencyEnergy storage & batteriesNone of these
4. 04What is your strongest technical evidence today?

   Qualification sponsor, test matrix, type test, or regulatory milestonePilot, loop, full-cell, or field data in representative conditionsLaboratory or coin-cell results only, no named sponsor yetMostly roadmap and market narrative so far
5. 05What does the product own?

   Our own hardware, physics, or processSoftware tightly coupled to our own sensors/hardwareA platform on top of third-party sensors, reactors, or meters
6. 06Where was the technology developed?

   Europe, Asia, Africa, the Gulf, or Latin AmericaElsewhere

This check encodes the public filters from the doctrine. It gates nothing — anyone can write — it only tells you what the first read will say.